Reiterating the Obvious

A Republic is important because it ensures a minority can’t have freedoms removed by corruption of a majority or influential oligarchy. We don’t enforce our current Constitution but we must because enforcement will restore freedom. If our republic was honored, we wouldn’t have private corporations (Monsanto) seizing citizen land and destroying private livelihood. They are members of world control clubs that enact control agendas wherever they do business. This is oligarchical tyranny. Globalists hijack the engines of capitalists to spread their agenda through exploitation of Uniform Commercial Code. UCC is the agreement of international business practice, and the raping of world resources is attributed to its methods. Corporate cronies have always been able to lobby and alter government policy but now they have increased leverage over offices because corporations can fund campaigns. The danger of this new ability by corporations is they can directly run propaganda campaigns against individuals if they decline to work in the company’s favor. Also, campaign funding equates to votes in a society where voters are ignorant and drugged into accepting propaganda as truth. It is unfortunate that most people vote based on what is said, instead of what has been done. Very little true research is done by the voter to verify claims.

If our republic was active, even elected representatives that were bought by corporate interests couldn’t change national policies. Globalists view republics as a danger to their plans because constitutions empower the minorities to maintain their ability to choose. America is no longer operating on its republic constitution. Our representatives do not have our best interests in mind. If we have private enterprise buying policy change, we have oligarchical dictatorship. America is a culture of corruption that exceeds far into government and foreign policy. Even American finances are outsourced to private enterprise (Federal Reserve, World Bank).

Taxation is all about creating wage-slaves. The control freaks would rather your employer send your check directly to them and once they remove whatever tax they decide then they would send you what remains. Vast amounts of monetary leverage leads to corruption and negative policy changes that attack freedom. Corruption has a limited oppressive effect in a republic because an honored constitution can’t allow it to exist. But a democracy built of weak men can dismantle a nation overnight. Smaller government reduces taxation and people could better manage their own social and business dealings if taxation was non-existent.

Democracy, as a government system, has the obvious flaw of allowing a majority to enact policy over minorities. Our republic has the capacity to manage all with a common rule of law. We can honor a democratic decision process, as long as it’s on matters that don’t upset the constitution and affect the public liberty (ability to choose). Our republic was designed to protect its people from an oppressive regime. It is important to maintain the public’s ability to attack politically, as well as physically. But we cannot do this in a democratic arena where the supposed elected representatives are bought and operate as oligarchical dictators controlling policies to increase profits of select private enterprise or further secretive agendas. A return to freedom at this point will only be obtained through physical conflict. In fact, such a statement will trigger their use of force to remove people from society that harbor initiatives for spreading this truth, under the pretext that we are a “threat to the establishment”. Their assumption would be accurate, but the establishment is thus proven tyrannous and any acts of revolution would be justified.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

Diminished Republic

I think the human race would be fine if the power hungry oligarchical global bankers and financiers were exposed and arrested. The countries that think they know what’s best for the rest of the world need to stop invading others. The United States is the worst country for blatant disregard of sovereignty. America invades others and tramples culture everywhere they go. But it’s so easy to brainwash a nation of pill-heads when they faithfully accept what is presented to them. So many citizens believe in America; they think it can’t do wrong. That is their mistake and it weakens the US to corruption and policy contamination. Americans are naive and rich, so they’re targeted by oligarchies seeking a strong host to dictate policy to the planet. Through research, this is what I have come to believe. If you have a genuine interest in these matters, I urge you to train yourself in truth-seeking.

It’s unfortunate but the USA will have to restore its republic and violently revolt to break away from globalist agendas. As soon as that happens, the USA is able to end intrusion into other nations and be a free nation again. Wow, that was a mouthful. It feels good to finally say that though. There are conformists that would argue America is a safe happy country that knows what’s best, but I can assure you they haven’t been the target of tyrannous acts that have been dealt to others in the name of progress. Progress!? Progress from what; a free society!? Don’t fix what isn’t broken. Is this why the socialists are referred to as progressives? What a happy sounding synonym for tyranny.

In my efforts to enlighten others to what is unfolding, I’ve encountered people that forgot the mainstream media uses deceptive propaganda. They assume what they’re told is true. That is the core of Americas’ problem. So, it’s easy for everyone to simply agree to the agenda. Propaganda is used to persuade them that invading others is normal and proper. And then you rarely ever get them to perform research or ask questions for themselves. There are some smart folks out there but way more ignorant Americans; I fear it will never fully turn around. Anyway, I think I’ve said too much. I’m probably making myself a bigger target but it’s hard to stay quiet when your country is trying to dominate you.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

The FDA and Solution D

Let’s suppose for a moment the FDA actually banned products that contain harmful substances from being used in Food & Drugs. This task is what they’re presently charged with but that doesn’t explain the myriad of harmful vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs available that are pushed on to everyone. For the remainder of this article, we’ll assume they’re effective at their purpose.

If a nefarious group had an agenda to poison the population with a mass-marketed product, they’d never get approval from the FDA because they’d discover their product was harmful. The group would have to be very sneaky to succeed.

I have a formula that shows the capability of contamination even with a functioning food and drug safety authority.

A + B = D (Combining A plus B equals the Desired effect.)

Compound A = Atmospheric contamination
Compound B = Bodily contamination
Solution D = Disease/Death/Desired Effect

The malicious group would split Solution-D into two parts and place them into separate environments. It could be separated into many pieces but for argument simplicity, we’ll just use the two parts example. Compound A is rendered aerosol and released into the atmosphere somehow, like aircraft chemical trails or more stealthy measures. It is managed and dispersed under a different company than its B counterpart. In fact, Compound A wouldn’t even be under FDA governance because it’s not delivered as a consumable. Compound B could be placed in pesticides, GMO foods, inhalants, food can liners, drugs, vaccines, water, or any other commonly consumed items. Both compound A and B pass inspection because they are supposedly harmless while in their own environments. When the two compounds combine in the body, it creates Solution D and activates cancers, diseases, disorders, fatal toxicities, mutations, or the solution may just sterilize you.

Remember, the FDA may also not consider the effect Solution-D produces as “harmful”. An effect is deemed harmful by interpretation of the definition. So, how do they define harmful? Does their definition include DNA manipulation, mutations, reduced fertility, or other unwanted invisible effects that violate choice? With all the known medications and vaccines that are directly causing illness and death, it’s obvious the FDA isn’t considering our best interests.

The scenario I just explained is by design. You just can’t trust your health to “industry professionals” anymore. Inform yourself and know the facts before you consume what others have classified as “safe”. They only know what they’re told and they only tell what they’re allowed.

-Jeremy Edward Dion