The Homegrown Albatross

The United States of America has become a corporatized self-interest entity. A country of collectivists, authoritarians and dictators. We are a nation of regulations upon regulations; where a free market hasn’t existed since the taxation of society and their operations. The issue has become tempered by time and we’ve been conditioned for it but taxation isn’t vital or even practical to progress. The reality is: taxation is an albatross upon the people. I will prove it through argument.

First understand that taxation is a socialist economic practice. The funds are collected from all people then distributed into a great many things that others use more than you. It’s a model for redistribution of wealth. That is a trendy term right now but the only time you can have corruption is when using intermediaries to decide how money or resources should be trafficked and used; hence you have collectivists and the creation of the state. Collectivists are individuals claiming that ‘the group’ has more right to power and process than any individual among them or anywhere. It’s their philosophy that people require to be managed. This is not to be confused with organization. A group may organize their efforts to have their will be done, that is fine and well; however it is the goal of collectivists to inflict that will upon those not party to their organization. This is a mild form of tyranny because they must use the guise of authority to force their will. And because of this alleged “service” to the public, they must be paid for their job. And all must pay regardless whether or not you’re directly affected by their actions. And they will force your compliance and use your money however they desire. Thus we have the corruption of these current days: closed-session deals, price-fixing, drugs/weapons/human trafficking, war profiteering, authoritarian intimidation, gag orders, murder, embezzlement, money laundering, loan sharking, bribery, obstruction of justice, and other forms of racketeering. These are common practices between government and organizations within its beltway of corruption. None of which would be possible without YOUR money.

And so.. collectivists fabricate positions of authority and management to direct actions, supposedly on behalf of the public; although you never see the white-collar working on the roadway. Any interested group of individuals could hire people to fix the roadway. A single man could follow directions on a bag of cement and repair a pothole. But the state has a monopoly on transportation and repair. Don’t ever let them catch you fixing something if you aren’t DOT certified, commissioned and micro-managed by acronymic regulatory boards of white-collared freeloaders.

Back to the issue at hand. Taxation and its effect on inflationary costs. Concerning the income tax.. if you generate more income, you pay more taxes. I’m not even discussing the percentages, I’m simply saying the outgoing unit value in taxation is higher if your income is higher. This is a constant and it’s important to understand the practice of compound taxation, which is where we are today. There are local, state and federal taxes; then there are common goods (sales), food, fuel, income, payroll, and property taxes. Some would say I have repeated tax burdens in the preceding list; I have not. They are each clearly separate with different tax percentages, therefore they are different taxes. For example, a fuel tax could be argued as a sales tax but it is a different rate and therefore separate. In some areas it has become illegal to barter goods or services because it’s arguably a manner to evade taxation; which they will of course tell you is criminal. I assure you bartering is not immoral but according to the collectivists’ code books, it may be classified as a fineable offense and subject to recompense.

It doesn’t take a degree in economics to understand that taxation is a burden on society that arrests community development and social progress. It could take months to get a bump in the road fixed by a collectivist statist model bickering over how to spend your money; whereas a small group of able-bodied individuals that drive that road daily could buy the needed repair products and make an afternoon of it. Then you might say, no one has time to do anything like that between their jobs. Nonsense, because without the burden of taxation, there is no loss of time from needless record-keeping for taxes you don’t have to struggle and waste time to pay. You work your job and get paid then at your leisure you put that money back into your community immediately where it needs it, without overregulated bureaucracy and burdens of paying third parties huge chunks of your money. The free market economy will flourish and collectivist corruption models will disappear because interrelation among trading parties is self-regulated by reputation and common law practice.

Oh but that’s such a scary idea because what about insurance, pensions, social security and retirement?

Insurance is nearly a complete Charles Ponzi-style racket, and in many instances its mandatory and serves to hike up the price of the services it’s issued for. Pensions are derived from your employer withholding money from you, in the hopes you will die before they can pay you the total sum. Ultimately they could file bankruptcy and you’d be fucked. Social security is a mandatory socialist money redistribution model that’s highly mismanaged into fraudulent activity; not to mention that the SS number is a continually exploited security risk concerning identity and property. Social Security is allegedly insured and backed by government, but everyone else is paying for it, whether they bought into it or not. Retirement is the action of not working anymore but you’re going to still require money for food and care once you stop working; no doubt necessitating these taxed money schemes. But people forget that if you didn’t have the tax burden or let middle-men mismanage your money, you would have more than enough saved for your retirement and healthcare. Not to mention you would have enough money to be eating healthier throughout your work years, thus negating most of your late-life care costs.

Insurance is an assurance to pay, institutions like hospitals and lawyers know this so they raise the cost of the procedures of operation because there is a definite source of payment. Of course the regulatory boards allow this immoral and fraudulent behavior because all money is taxable income. Consider the fact that even outlawed activities like soliciting prostitution is legal if it’s renamed and taxable. Whores are no longer arrested if they solicit for an escort agency, but they’re still prostitutes. That may not be a palatable pill to swallow but it’s the truth. I personally don’t have criminal concerns about drugs or prostitution; let adults do what they like with their bodies. So really institutions like government, cares not for common moral law or even the well-being of its people; but they’ll deceive and manipulate to chase your dollar all the way into the pit if it serves their collective.

This is not the result of society or the practice of capitalism. Remember that capitalism is merely the belief that one can own something; property. Even the billionaires of the planet would have nothing without capitalism. They certainly control more land than most but it’s arguable if even the rich own their lands. That is, of course, if you understand the true meaning of ownership. Even the US land deeds claim the holders as tenants. The land is quite possibly owned by the Crown from old English banking cartels much like those which operated under the name of The Virginia Company many centuries ago. With the help of clever wording from the British Accredited Registry (BAR), the Crown has managed to fool everyone into residing on their land as long as they pay their rent (tax). It is often said that “possession is 9/10 of ownership”. Perhaps that is because the remaining 10% is the tax imposed by the true owner.

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.
– Benjamin Franklin

This is a troubling quote for many but old Benjamin obviously had a sense of humor. Of course taxes are not certain because you can certainly go without paying taxes. Those that don’t understand logic will argue this as a truth from there and back, but they don’t consider that Benjamin was pointing out the problem of the practice of taxation. Certainly there is no record of one escaping death, but taxation..? Because people have taken this so seriously, the practice of taxation has become the driving force of new slavery; enforced by militarized groups of mercenaries working for the greed and corruption of third parties. That threat is beyond anything we’ve ever seen before; far surpassing the threat of force at the muzzles of the British in pre-revolutionary war.

Today a war like that could never take place because people are not empowered by true independence. The mental conditioning and dependency on the state has overwhelmed too many. People are scattered and disorganized in their politics and will not take a stand against even what they know in their heart is wrong because it isn’t normal behavior to be free of collectivist burdens. Most people are impressionable, ignorant, weak and slow. They have little willpower outside their accustomed programmatic slave labor, and they’re ruined by behavioral faults. There is very little honor among the public of city life because they’re pioneers of the system that enslaves them. They are ultimately robots programmed to be a part of a system they grow to hate. There’s very few human infrastructure in your vision of paradise for a reason. People ultimately know that cities are where the slaves toil and work for each other. The food is overly-processed garbage, the medical industry dispenses liver-destroying toxic waste and the taxes are two-fold. It’s great for spending money with friends as a vacation from what is normal; as long as your ‘normal’ is a peaceful quiet plot of land in a temperate climate away from others, where you can focus on living in harmony with the environment with little to no money.

No. Taxes are not certain. Our forefathers fought tooth and nail to be free from the fees of middle-men and succeeded, albeit for a short period of time. Freedom from the burden of taxation can be accomplished, though many unsavory elements of collectivist societies would no doubt perish in the process of restoring that freedom. Taxation is a long running scam whereby the entire modern infrastructure of government relies on its continued enforcement. I believe I’ve truly become an anarchist, but I at least realize that anarchy is a phase of transition to another form of organization. Organization is autonomous because people form a society for obvious benefits of interaction and ability. People can have community, organization and a functional society without the burden of government middle-men. The proof is obvious. Our species has existed to the point where we created collectivist taxation models, certainly not operating on them previously. Trade can occur without regulation. In fact, the beauty of the blossoming free market relies on the principle of no regulation.

Ideally.. People are to trade goods and services voluntarily with whomever they wish; without middle-men, regulatory boards and mandatory inclusion to programs. That’s where independence lies. I’m not of any illusions that reverting to a free society could be accomplished without physical conflict. We must take the freedom back by force, because there is no reasoning with a collectivist. They will always have you under their thumb included in some form or another. And with inclusion comes the costs and burdens of the many. The flaw of the collectivist mindset is their unreasonable archaic philosophy that all must make sacrifices for everyone. It is also their weakness, as major proponents of collectivist practices often exemplify the double-standard of their argument. They are horrible people. The political arena of liars displays these behavioral flaws callously; regularly caught lying, being hypocritical and practicing double-standards. Evil cannot escape its true nature and the moral can spot the demon easily.

Greed is a fascinating flaw. It has caused the most developmental harm to society. It’s as if the mother of America has taken thalidomide with a side order of depleted uranium. The damage is done and all we can do is hope some of us can still create a pure future. Every day I discover it’s the most horrible of days as I read new stories of the unreasonably insane dictating new law and practice. I will not allow this to continue. It may take lustrums or decades but I will find a way to extinguish the practices of collectivism and restore the freedom of voluntary participation at least for myself, if not for all that I care. It may simply be a matter of informing the right people of my experience and analysis of these systems of control and domination, or it could take much more. I feel it’s the duty of moral people to maintain an orderly society; one without the packaged corruptions of mandatory involvement or monopolies. I don’t think they’ve given us much choice and ultimately it will be at the advent of their destruction that we will begin to relearn responsibility and have peace.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

Modern Liberalism

Modern Liberalism

The term “liberal” has been redefined from repeated ignorant misuse. But as far as it’s used today, liberalism is a counter-culture movement of morally bankrupt individuals poisoned and conditioned by the state to depend on the state; used as a vehicle for change more than for progress. Liberals are self-centered uninformed, or otherwise stubborn, types of dependents that don’t want others exercising freedoms they themselves are frightened to exercise. They are truly micro-managing authoritarian cowards favoring a communist state control model even when they do not self-identify as such. For example: They don’t have or like guns so they require illegal legislation to keep others from having them. You know.. For the Greater good.

Liberalism is like a popularity pageant where no one outside their clique cares for the contest, and the winners are the most deviant sycophants. They are quite an illogical and irrational bunch that believe individuality is the core problem in societal relations. They don’t give much credence to “conspiracy theories” or any other type of analytical thinking that would require a triple digit intelligence quotient. Liberals have poor reasoning skills and may become irate when their arguments are opposed with logic. They fall all over each other about being pacifists, as if that were a characteristic to be proud of; meanwhile they are the first to lie, steal, cheat, rape and attack others because they are control freaks at heart that value deception and manipulation above consent and personal choice.

So, you’ve asked what I call the misnomer of modern liberalism.

And its proponents are Sociopaths.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

Declaration of Independence

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

      Button Gwinnett
      Lyman Hall
      George Walton

North Carolina:
      William Hooper
      Joseph Hewes
      John Penn
South Carolina:
      Edward Rutledge
      Thomas Heyward, Jr.
      Thomas Lynch, Jr.
      Arthur Middleton

      John Hancock
      Samuel Chase
      William Paca
      Thomas Stone
      Charles Carroll of Carrollton
      George Wythe
      Richard Henry Lee
      Thomas Jefferson
      Benjamin Harrison
      Thomas Nelson, Jr.
      Francis Lightfoot Lee
      Carter Braxton

      Robert Morris
      Benjamin Rush
      Benjamin Franklin
      John Morton
      George Clymer
      James Smith
      George Taylor
      James Wilson
      George Ross
      Caesar Rodney
      George Read
      Thomas McKean

New York:
      William Floyd
      Philip Livingston
      Francis Lewis
      Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
      Richard Stockton
      John Witherspoon
      Francis Hopkinson
      John Hart
      Abraham Clark

New Hampshire:
      Josiah Bartlett
      William Whipple
      Samuel Adams
      John Adams
      Robert Treat Paine
      Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
      Stephen Hopkins
      William Ellery
      Roger Sherman
      Samuel Huntington
      William Williams
      Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
      Matthew Thornton

-Jeremy Edward Dion

No Thing Good

Illuminate Darkness

There’s an annoying pain in my foot. It’s a reminder of past accidents and current regrets. I don’t currently have anything good I want to say. I’m not feeling well right now. There is so much to respond to but I have nothing constructive to add. Things are falling apart. I’m ten days from leaving the state. I’m not looking forward to the drive but I’m excited about the destination. But now my attitude and hope has changed. It took years to be rid of the pain before. It’s back with a vengeance. I knew better than to get comfortable in my environment. I must always be guarded. Everything is designed against you. On a long enough timeline, people are defeated by their environment.

I hate the dark. It’s a classically simple deception. One would not expect danger to be at every corner, but that is the nature of darkness. It is the illumination of those spaces that delivers us from our troubles. It’s too late for me. I can’t trust that things are where they should be in the dark. No one should. It’s quite an unfortunate reality.

I sometimes wonder what it’s like to starve to death. I don’t know why I’ve been thinking about it. I hate food and eating, so I bet that has something to do with it. I’ve never gotten used to eating. Some things taste good but it’s still a burden, as are all things associated with eating. Like the dark, I don’t trust food. A vegetable can look beautiful in the light but as soon as it’s eaten it’s in darkness and begins doing unspeakable things to your body. It’s a really foreign concept. Everything people do is to ensure a food supply. The need for decent shelter can come and go with nomadic migration but food is what keeps the slaves from venturing too far from their trusted sources. People used to take a special interest in food, growing or acquiring it from local sources, but now people eat foreign objects from bags or cans shipped from far off lands. Food is a different kind of darkness and shouldn’t be trusted.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

Defined as Rebel

Merely knowing the truth will define you as a rebel.

I often got into arguments with teachers that would tell us things that were conjecture. I would mention other sources and perspectives and it would greatly annoy public school faculty. I persisted all through high school with this ‘rebellious nature’, but not because it annoyed them. I didn’t have a behavioral problem, I was merely informed otherwise about the historical events they were inculcating. Without even knowing about the terminology of “bias” or its meaning, I would debate the sources and the intent. To this day, I recall the inside of the principal’s office more than the classrooms, with the exception of one taught by someone also applying common sense to critical thinking during his class.

It’s not so much a big deal that one student would have to conform to untruths to pass a test. They ultimately didn’t care if I passed or failed, they simply wanted my obedience to the narrative. But my arguments were logical and valid and fellow students began asking the same types of questions. This would spur debates and they couldn’t have that happening because people might actually work out the truth. On many occasions I was ‘disrupting the class’ and asked to either quit with the ‘silly questioning’ (an attempt to discredit me) or sit in the hall.

In one incident of social studies (history class) during my sophomore year, I pointed out that the new edition of the textbook directly contradicted the statements of the previous year’s edition on several matters. This was a different teacher for that grade but when I presented the examples of the inconsistencies, I was told I would be graded from the new edition. I thought to myself, “yes of course, but..” She didn’t recognize the concerning issue I was presenting, it went right over her head that there’s misinformation, or perhaps malicious disinformation in the text. It was only several years ago that I realized that back in 1995, much of the faculty was already likely outright proponents of collectivism. I gave them the benefit of the doubt, and I was naive to think they didn’t see what was happening. I realize I had no business being in public school.

Today, the propaganda and groupthink psychology in the public school scene is far more severe and effective. It’s staggering to consider the increase in the use of fear-mongering to indoctrinate the young toward collectivist philosophies. They are conditioned to believe that all they see around them, the progress, and everything they have to be thankful for is because of their government; instead of the truth that it’s simply the product of individual ingenuity. There are those that took the freedom to create instead of merely consume.

Today the system is designed in such a manner to create debt; forcing many into a form of enslaved subjugation. The taxes, zoning and fines serve as tools to specifically target individual ‘owners’ of property. If the damaging philosophy that ‘people don’t own themselves’ doesn’t get adopted; on a long enough timeline, the collectivists can suck all the money out of your family and take everything you have. This must happen incrementally, otherwise it is generationally apparent. It is already apparent that it’s extortion but they profess to be authoritative specialists of law and justice when it’s simply a monopoly. Ultimately, collectivists would have totalitarianism if they could get it; they just might if we do nothing.

-Jeremy Edward Dion

Our Nation’s End

Over the recent months I’ve done a lot of research and writing for my next book. My focus is on morality. In my studies I have found many disturbing articles, reports and videos of misconduct from the executive branch right on down to select local police departments and individuals. Something all these people seem to share is a lack of respect for others. They are rude.

The best criminals I’ve ever seen are wearing suits or uniforms. They are the best criminals because they commit heinous crimes against their fellow countrymen but are seldom met with punishment for these crimes. These suits and uniforms are exempt from the laws they are tasked with governing and enforcing. This creates a rift in society. There is a hard division forming between the public and the professed government. When approaching a citizen on the street, or in a restaurant, or at their work, or in the general public; they can be engaged and spoken to without social discomfort. The same cannot be said when dealing with the suits and many uniforms of government. Certainly they have a code of conduct to follow, but how does that exclude the common courtesies they would extend to their mother or father? I can’t see a cop ripping their mother from a vehicle if she began asking questions about why she was stopped. And I can’t see two officers tasering their father when he pulls his arm away because they began grabbing at him when he exited the passenger door upon their request.

All persons are to be treated with respect until they give you a reason otherwise. I am noticing with more frequency police initiating assault. It is important to understand what assault means. Assault is a physical attack ‘or the threat of a physical attack’. Depending on circumstances, forms of assault can also be “battery”, or “aggravated assault” when weapons are used at varying degrees during an attack. And depending on the severity of the attack this could also lead into a whole slew of new charges about attempted murder and manslaughter; all of which law enforcement is seemingly immune to being charged with. What good are laws if only selected parties must abide?

Something has happened to the brains of these authoritarian individuals. It takes a particular type of person to assault strangers, and call it their job. I’m not talking about the armed forces like the Army or the Corps; with them, the recipients of their assaults have the courtesy of knowing they’re at war. No. I’m talking about police electrocuting and paralyzing random people inside the USA because they challenged the officers reasoning with a question and can’t understand the other cop that yells with a lisp in a southern accent. I have seen and read hundreds of these incidents, and about 20-30 new reports can be seen each week by cycling through the public reporting sites exposing this misconduct. And nothing is being done to lessen the spread of this behavior. We are instead giving these uniformed hooligans more powerful armored vehicles like MRAP’s. Meanwhile, by dictatorial decree, the executive branch of government is banning body armor, firearms and ammunition for the public; yet organizations of government and militarized police are exempt from such regulations.

We need to begin focusing on the violent nature of our police officers and why they’re misdirecting their hostilities toward the benevolent citizenry. I believe this behavior was exacerbated (if not started) by the “War on Drugs”, more of a war on the people, which has always been about removing our freedom of choice. Coincidentally, wars are great at growing an empire and extending the reach of an organization.

There has always been bad cops. Some places have a monopoly on “justice”, and they do things as they see fit. Small towns with a limited number of people able to make change to the system has a lot of bad to go wrong, especially when people stop caring for the community. But now the corruption from greed, hate and fear has spread to upper management of the major departments in big cities too. This is epidemic and no one is safe. It used to be media would report on these matters and there would be investigations and it would be a big deal. Now there is so much misconduct that society has become acclimated to hearing about such matters and there is no shock value, or they fantastically rationalize that somehow the victims deserved the mistreatment. Either way, it is less profitable for broadcasting as news.

A slight digression: For the first decade of my life, I grew up in a town that was rampant with narcotic use. I didn’t know then to what extent but found out later after moving away. I always knew to stay away from select neighborhoods because of their conditions. It was an old thread mill town with a bad heroin epidemic. You could find needles along the path between buildings in the downtown areas. I knew about drugs like heroin and how bad it was; the point is this: Whether heroin is illegal or not is of no concern to me. I’m simply educated enough to know it’s a burden and a health tax. Heroin being illegal certainly didn’t remove it from the environment, not while operations were underway by government assets to ship and distribute it to Hometown, USA; that’s another argument. Obviously the goal of ‘The War’ is less about curbing behavior and more about growing an enforcement organization.

We are now faced with an occupying force in the executive branch that controls hundreds of billions of shadow assets, is backed by foreign banking interests, capable of buying every single person in the legislative branch by favor or overt coercion. We have private contractors operating under secretive quasi-military clearances throughout various American cities, the constitutional basis of law is openly voided by the NAU agreement, the country is divided into FEMA regions, in a quiet state of emergency, under martial law, with an illegal CIA shill dictator ruling under rhetoric of democracy, meanwhile churning out executive orders unrelated to public legislation. And we have managed to piss off every single country on the planet by either invading them or ignoring their sovereignty in another manner. The worst part of this is the establishment repeatedly lied successfully to most of its population, and convinced some they want tyranny.

Congratulations America! This is the wild west. Law is no more. There is only force. Surviving in the wake of the suspension of common law will be an achievement. From what I know of history my advice is as follows:

Educate yourself about water filtration, basic nutrition and natural remedies to common conditions. Have a small stockpile of healthy food, and learn some about gardening in this age of depleted and contaminated soil. Stay clear of seasonal vaccinations, they’re sold for profit and weaken your immune system. Arm yourself. Find at least one rifle system, not too exotic, and learn it. Go to ranges, learn how to proficiently operate your weapon. Repetition will build confidence. Find someone that reloads ammunition and set up an arrangement if you can’t buy the ammo you need. Make allegiances with many people (not involved in government) that you can trust. Study tradecraft, social triggers (persuasion and dual meanings), cryptography, and message handling; discuss and employ these techniques with your allegiances. Learn not to rely on digital technology, as it will always be used against the public before it’s used to their benefit. Stay out of the crosshairs of government and away from the justice system. Keep family close because sometimes that is all that can help you. If you can avoid it, don’t live in large cities. Plan an exit strategy from your residence and out of town in case of an emergency. Find a supplemental source of cash income that you can avoid declaring to be taxed. Barter as much as possible, favors for favors and product for product. Follow the golden rule of conduct; free yourself from the anxiety of following every written law, rule and ordinance. Ignore their tyranny as your safety persists.

It will likely take several years to organize, especially when it concerns building trust relationships, but I believe there is another decade of despotic incrementalism before a critical mass of support is reached for a successful revolt toward restoring balance. I hope some can find this editorial helpful. I do care about all of us. I want as many people as possible to understand the dangers we face as a nation. Things are bad, and I believe they’re going to get worse, but we will see our way through this when we educate ourselves and unite in purpose.

-Jeremy Edward Dion


Legislative changes are unavoidable in a democracy. People who are content with their current liberties feel they can do nothing and maintain comforts while people who aim to remove freedoms are busy organizing and voting. This is the nature and relationship between people and democracy. It’s a practice of mild authoritarianism distributed across the doers of a society. The remaining population relaxes and allows the will of the doers to become law; finding their freedoms incrementally diminished. Such is the explanation of the decline of apathetic societies containing decadent folks. Dictators and active participants of the legislative processes set the rule, and the rest get the stick. So it’s important to understand the reasoning why an inalienable standard of law and liberty among all people should be enforced and defended. Because democracy is a parasite that always kills its host.

Certainly the democratic process works for a reasonable amount of time. Societies have always felt comfortable with the idea and practice of voting for an outcome that would impact their environment. On the surface it sounds like a really good solution to determine the future of changes. But this system, like any system, is no exception to fallibility by the will of hackers. Psychologists have proven that when people are presented with a problem, more often than not, they will take the easy way out of it. The government complex has understood this human weakness for centuries and incrementally polarized the democratic process between two targets; republicans or democrats (Red vs. Blue). Both groups are “parties”; exactly as they are called, neither have any real critical thinkers among them and cannot function individually. Even if someone did, they will discredit their own if one goes outside partisanship. Ultimately, there has to be a manager for each party that sets the direction based on polling and the public atmosphere. Don’t misunderstand what I mean here. I’m simply saying both parties work together and the polling information is important to reformat Red and Blue talking points to effectively divide the nation. All of this is designed by the will of the corrupt.

Back to the psychology problem.. The voting systems of this time exploit the human inclination to choose easier solutions by having what they call a “Straight Party Vote”. This is effectively the easy-out for people that know very little of the candidates, yet wish to “GO VOTE” because it’s their right. Yes, people can actually go to the voting machine and hit a button marked ‘Vote Democrat’ and their ballot is automatically filled out. This practice betrays everything that is good about choice. What good is making choices if you have not a clue about the effects of your actions, or if your voting options are limited to horrible candidates. Choices between ones that don’t listen and ones that always lie aren’t real choices. If you wouldn’t vote for any of the selections, then perhaps the democratic process isn’t working for you. And I haven’t even begun to discuss the rampant fraud of these systems, the absence of real representation or the threat of corrupting forces. I will speak of these later.

Another common oversight with the democratic process is that people vote for what they want, and don’t concern themselves with the wants of others. This is a core flaw with the collectivist model. Being selfish is one thing but imposing your will on your neighbor is definitely repressive. Here’s a simple argument. If you don’t like guns, don’t own one. The moment you vote against the freedom of your neighbors to make those decisions for themselves is the day you become illiberal; undemocratic and restraining the freedom of others. The obvious irony of this particular argument is that the party calling themselves the “Democratic Party” champions the illegal action to disarm Americans; removing the public ability to choose for themselves. That’s not freedom. It is, however, the motions of authoritarians evolving toward totalitarianism. In fact, the majority of the effects of the legislative process is shockingly undemocratic regardless of party.

There is no solution to this problem. Democracy is still a collectivist model and will always bring societal ruin unless it is limited in how it is applied. Gee whiz, if only we had a masterful governing document written by the people that allowed all people particular unalienable rights while limiting the legislative powers of the senate and congress as well as the authority of the executive branch. That would be something I’d want to read.


-Jeremy Edward Dion